Fact-Check: Imran Khan made five false claims about the JIT. Now, four out of five members of the Joint Investigation Team have come forward to refute his claims.
Fact-Check: Imran Khan made five false claims about the JIT
Last week, previous state head Imran Khan made a few cases connected with the discoveries of the Joint Examination Group (JIT), including that it has tracked down proof to propose that three shooters were available on the day Khan was gone after.
The assertion is false..jpg "Fact-Check: Imran Khan made five false claims about the JIT")
Claim:
In a televised speech on January 5, Imran Khan, who is also chairman of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), claimed that the Punjab government's November 15-constituted JIT had revealed the following:
On November 3, Khan and the PTI gathering were hit by three gunmen.
Naveed, the principal accused, was the real target of the gunmen, so Moazzam's death was an accident.
- The polygraph test demonstrated that Naveed lied about having only one other contact. Khan said that the attack was part of a bigger plan.
- Additionally, Naveed lied about not having received any firearms training. He was a skilled shooter, Khan said.
The JIT findings have disproved the claim that the attacker, Naveed, was motivated by religious beliefs.
The JIT's findings have all been presented to the court.
On November 3, Khan and the PTI gathering were hit by three gunmen.
Naveed, the principal accused, was the real target of the gunmen, so Moazzam's death was an accident.
- The polygraph test demonstrated that Naveed lied about having only one other contact. Khan said that the attack was part of a bigger plan.
- Additionally, Naveed lied about not having received any firearms training. He was a skilled shooter, Khan said.
The JIT findings have disproved the claim that the attacker, Naveed, was motivated by religious beliefs.
The JIT's findings have all been presented to the court.
Fact:
In a joint letter to the JIT convener, Capital City Police Officer Lahore, four out of five members of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) have come forward to refute Imran Khan's unsubstantiated claims.
The letter has been acknowledged by: Ehsan Ullah Chohan, the SP/AIG Monitoring, Khurram Ali, the RPO DG Khan, Naseeb Ullah Khan, the SSP Intelligence CTD Punjab, and Tariq Mehboob, the SP Pothohar Division, Rawalpindi
The four members have refuted the following claims in the letter:
Claim: Three gunmen were present.
Members of JIT: There is no credible evidence in the record to suggest that more than one firefighter or assailant was present.
Claim: Moazzam was accidentally killed when Naveed was the real target.
Members of JIT: Who was to blame for Moazzam's death has not yet been established.
Claim: Naveed lied about having only one other contact, according to a lie detector test.
The letter has been acknowledged by: Ehsan Ullah Chohan, the SP/AIG Monitoring, Khurram Ali, the RPO DG Khan, Naseeb Ullah Khan, the SSP Intelligence CTD Punjab, and Tariq Mehboob, the SP Pothohar Division, Rawalpindi
The four members have refuted the following claims in the letter:
Claim: Three gunmen were present.
Members of JIT: There is no credible evidence in the record to suggest that more than one firefighter or assailant was present.
Claim: Moazzam was accidentally killed when Naveed was the real target.
Members of JIT: Who was to blame for Moazzam's death has not yet been established.
Claim: Naveed lied about having only one other contact, according to a lie detector test.
Claim: The JIT findings have disproved the attacker's religious motivation claim.Members of JIT: There hasn't been a single data or call record or witness found that links the main suspect to anyone else involved in the crime are planning.
Members of JIT: It makes no sense, at this point, to use the investigation into the case that was registered in Green Town, Lahore, as a basis or motivation for this significant case.
.jpg "Fact-Check: Imran Khan made five false claims about the JIT") |
Fact-Check: Imran Khan made five false claims about the JIT |
Members of JIT: It makes no sense, at this point, to use the investigation into the case that was registered in Green Town, Lahore, as a basis or motivation for this significant case.
0 Comments
If you have any doubts, please let me know